Groundrules

This will be a moderated blog. Like our small groups, the blog will have ground rules. No unsolicited advice giving. Be kind & respectful of others. Share your views as your views without attacking the viewpoint of others. Pastors will moderate the blog like small group leaders moderate a small group discussion.

Focus on biblical material itself. The text is the movie, the blog is the conversation about the movie afterwards.

Sunday, October 25, 2009

Part 6: Intimacy, Accountability, & Judging (1 Cor. 5)

                      
Free to Love
                      
SERMON OUTLINE & SUMMARY

                            
Series: Free to Love - How to Leave the Judging to the Judge
Part 6: Intimacy, Accountability, & Judging (1 Cor. 5)
October 25, 2009 | by Ken Wilson


SERMON OUTLINE & SUMMARY


Review: Last week compared two different mindsets regarding truth:  Greek Mindset: abstract, precise, universal; Hebrew Mindset:  personal, holistic, paradoxical.

Today text stands in paradoxical tension with judge not: 1 Cor. 5, p. 782

1 Cor. 5: 1-6

Paul misjudged by moderns as trigger happy bad cop; but he is a mystic, a pastor, a missionary; in his day, he was mainly accused of being soft on righteousness, that his gospel promoted sin (See Ro. 3:8)

Extreme case: a man (adult) sleeping with his father's wife; something condemned even by the sexually permissive Corinthian pagans.

Background: Corinthian church thought they had superior knowledge that placed them completely above any law or rules. (See 1 Cor. 4:8, 6:12)

"hand this man over to Satan": unclear, could mean if he is out of church will be handed over to accusation of rest of society (under the Satan's rule) and be in heap of trouble; will have only God to turn to, who can then talk sense into him.

1 Cor. 5: 6-13

A careful reading reveals challenge of applying: sexually immoral = porneia; drunkards, greedy, idolaters, bullets not easily dodged.

Example Greed: global scale of wealth. Poorest of poor =  no family,  job, housing, health care, place to die; Ordinary poor = limited access to income, housing, food, health care; Ordinary wealthy = access to jobs, housing, food, health care, transportation; Wealthiest of wealthy = billionaires

Most of us are "ordinary wealthy" [some ordinary poor].  For follower of Jesus what's expected in are of giving? Maximum: give away everything; Minimum give away a tenth. [Spiritual disciplines = discipline of disciples]

If we have access to income, housing, food, health care, transportation and don't do the minimum expected of disciples, might we be at ask risk of being evaluated as greedy?  At risk of being evaluated as serving money above God (idolatry.)

Doesn't mean this is not inspired Scripture, it is. Doesn't mean we should be casual about sin just because it's common. We shouldn't, especially not our own.

Does mean we should not cherry pick when it comes to application.  And we should cry out to the Spirit for a genuine work of repentance-revival.

Sidebar: speaker's frustration with those who complain about pastors being "soft on sin"

We misapply this text when we forget the context: a community of believers in intimate relationships, house church, small group, high level of financial sharing.  [contrast with
modern "community"]  (see Acts 5: 32-35; 1 Cor. 16: 19-20)

Modern churches are semi-public venues that offer opportunity for growth toward the kind of community experienced as normative in NT era (and much of developing world today)

HOW IT WORKS: A small group learns to love each other: bear each others burdens and so fulfill law of Christ [Royal Law] (see Gal. 6:2)  Over time [not automatic, requires intention, discipleship to Jesus, leading of Spirit] people share their burdens, little ones first, then big ones, most personal & sensitive later.  In such setting accountability works and is life-saving as it probably was in 1 Cor 5  [2 Co 2: 6 indicates redemptive effect]

Modern church has taken a different path: attempted high accountability, low intimacy...and shocked (!) when it doesn't work.   [Example: modern emphasis on moral policy statements that are developed like planks in a party platform, adopted at a convention run like a political convention.]

Paul's approach: Create a community of those pursuing Jesus. Form households, cells, small-intimate units where people practice Royal Law with each other.  Coach them along the intimacy-accountability scale until they can actually speak truth in love.  

Jesus taught need for accountability in church: Matt 18: 15-20   Text about confronting sin in church. Context: intimate circle of believers (wherever two or three are gathered).

[See wider context of Matt. 18: 15-20, emphasizing gentleness, mercy]


For complete sermon notes online, visit our sermons page.

                      
PRACTICAL TIPS

                            

1. If part of a small group: Discuss the intimacy-accountability scale.

2. If desire to move up scale, consider how. Invite additional coaching as desired. 

Read Life Together, Dietrich Bonhoeffer

3. For those with nerve, curiosity and sense of adventure: invite a trusted friend to offer you input on any area of your life.  Ask them to be prayer before offering it. Take whatever they offer to prayer. See if God speaks to you through this. 

                      
QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION

                            

1. Is your own way of thinking more in line with Greek thought or Hebrew thought?

2. Which spiritual disciplines are the most challenging for you?  Are there any disciplines which you haven't tried to incorporate into your own life?

3. Which of the sins listed by Paul in 1 Cor 5 is the most promenint in members of the American church today?

4. Do you consider yourself wealthy? Take the quiz at the Global Rich List.  What percentile are you at? Does this change your perspective?

5. Which sins is the American church most soft on?

6. Do you have people in your life with whom you share both intimacy and accountability? If you don't, how could you begin to experience this?

7. How do we apply the teaching of Paul in 1 Cor 5 in light of the Royal Law (James 2:8)?


Monday, October 19, 2009

Part 5: James Weighs In on Judging

Free to Love

SERMON OUTLINE & SUMMARY
Series: Free to Love - How to Leave the Judging to the Judge
Part 5: James Weighs In on Judging
October 18, 2009 | by Ken Wilson


SERMON OUTLINE & SUMMARY


We struggle with biblical
teaching on judging. Bible seems to ban it in one place, do it in another.
Within the same book, or letter even.

We struggle because we have
a different truth mindset than Bible.

Greek Mindset                  Hebrew Mindset
abstract                             personal
precise                               holistic
universal                             paradoxical

Greek mindset wants to
understand truth systematically. Hebrew mindset: Why would we need a system if
we have a person?

In Greek mindset, seek to master truth, get it down pat. In Hebrew mindset we seek to be in a functioning relationship with true God.

James powerfully shaped by Sermon on the Mount: In form of "stringing pearls of wisdom"

First Pearl: warning against anger: James 1: 19-20

God judges because evil angers him. Can't appreciate evil without sensing God's personal reaction: anger. Our anger, however, is not so reliable.

Second Pearl: social bias is judging: James 2: 1-4

Modern church riddled with bias-judging

Third Pearl: For humans, judging hinders loving: James 2: 8-12

Pattern is straight out of his brother's most famous sermon: Watch out for anger. Don't judge, lest you be judged. In everything, do to others as you would have them do to you--this is the Bible. 

"If you really keep the royal law found in Scripture, "Love your neighbor as yourself...  you are doing right."

We want to understand all distinctions--what is judging vs. discerning, appropriate judging vs. inappropriate judging--but Bible not so helpful. Not a biblical concern

Jesus: If you're to follow me, I will lead you on the path to radical-self-giving love. This is narrow way, not broad path. And judging, one of main duties of man's righteousness will hinder you on that path.  

Often we don't love well because our judging gets in the way. We judge people as adulterers, thieves, idolaters, one thing or another.

Problem with "love the sinner, hate the sin": nice theory, but we often use it as a dodge. We are all "one thing or another"; adulterers, thieves, gossips. If you have broken any part of law, you are a law-breaker.

Speak and act as those who are going to judged by the law that gives freedom.
+ reference to the "Royal Law," i.e. Messianic King's Law (Mt. 7:12)
+ "You will be judged by this Law" is a way of saying "Pay attention to this one!"

A simple law (idiot proof righteousness?) as it only takes a little imagination: how do I want to be loved?

We have to start loving others like that. And judging gets in our way.

Fourth Pearl: Speaking against is a form of judging: James 4: 11-12

To slander is to "speak against" another

Job 1: 9-11  Example of devil's speaking against Job (a fairly mild criticism of Job)

We must read this personally, not abstractly (seeking to distill theory): prayerfully, vulnerably, humbly, non-defensively, listening for the Spirit: James 4: 11-12.

"Who are you to judge?" Notice, it's not that your judgment is accurate or inaccurate. It's that there is a judge who is on duty already.

"God is a righteous judge; God sits in judgment every day." (Ps. 7:11)

Fifth Peal: James 5: 7-9

Numbers as background: people impatient with fulfillment deferred are prone to "grumble against" each other.

For complete sermon notes online, visit our sermons page.


PRACTICAL TIPS


walking1.   Identity a Numbers-esque situation in your life.

2.   Ask, "Has a key relationship been affected?"

3.   Is my grumbling against them a symptom of my beef with God?

4.   Mediate on James 5: 7-9

5.   Ask for a creative idea to reverse the grumbling effect.

6.   Once the idea arrives, do it.

7.   How did it go?  Assess impact on your heart or on the relationship?



QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION

candy1. Have you ever been bothered by what seems to be a contradiction in Scripture? Which?

2. Have you ever taken the Myers-Briggs personality inventory? How do you think your personality influences the way you read and understand Scripture?

3. What's the difference between intelligence and wisdom? Which do we tend to value more, and why?

4. What kind of social biases do you see in the church today? How do we overcome this tendency?

5. What does "love the sinner, hate the sin" mean. How does this work in actual practice?

6. Read Proverbs 1:7; 9:10; and Psalm 111:10. What do these verses mean?

Discuss with others at our sermon blog.

Sunday, October 11, 2009

Part 4: Paul Weighs In on Judging

Free to Love

SERMON OUTLINE & SUMMARY
Series: Free to Love - How to Leave the Judging to the Judge
Part 4: Paul Weighs In on Judging
October 11, 2009 | by Ken Wilson


SERMON OUTLINE & SUMMARY


Like Jesus in Sermon on Mount Paul sees gospel as a new path to righteousness: "For in the gospel the righteousness of God is revealed" (Ro. 1: 17)

For rest of ROMANS 1, Paul sets us up for this new path by exposing the root & fruit  paganism, because he's writing to center of Empire

Romans 1 traces the downward spiral of paganism from ingratitude to idolatry to "a depraved mind" and its fruit: greed, envy, gossip, slander, absence of covenant love.

Might expect Paul to rally the troops in a moral crusade against pagan sins.  Instead, Paul unleashes the sword that pierced his soul when Jesus knocked him off his high horse of judgment when he was an up & coming Pharisee:

Romans 2: 1-4, Paul's version of "Don't judge or you will be judged." (Mt. 7:1)

Fast forward to Romans 13: 8-10 Love is our aim!

Same two-fold emphasis in Sermon on Mount "Do not judge or you too will be judged." (Mt. 7:1) followed by a laser focus on love: "So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets."  (Mt. 7:12)

Ro 13 love focus followed by judgment prohibition: Ro 14: 1-13
These debates in early church were a REALLY BIG DEAL, as fierce as any today.

A PAUSE IN THE SERIES TO REVIEW AND CLARIFY

People unfamiliar with the teachings of Jesus, might hear sharp teaching about not judging as gentle Jesus meek & mild saying, Anything goes! If it feels good do it!

Meanwhile mature believers get nervous that "not judging" could lead to moral anarchy, and their ears get thick to the word of the Lord.

The Bible says the original choice not between good & evil, but between tree of life and knowledge of good & evil.

Our lives will revolve around something, and the choices are these:

TREE:      Knowledge of good & evil    or    Life [eternal]
FRUIT:     JUDGMENT & JUDGING                 LOVE
             
We shift orbits from the knowledge & evil and the judging that characterizes this form of righteousness, to the tree of eternal life,  and the rule of love that is the fruit of this tree.

Jesus transfers us from one domain to another: domain of knowledge of good & evil to the domain of eternal life.  Two domains, two kingdoms, two ruling powers: judging or love

And this is where mature believers get hung up. We're fear that if we give too much room to this "Don't judge" business, all we have left is anything goes! Gosh, just what this world needs more of: the anything goes mentality!

You've got men who go to Thailand for a weekend of sex with girls sold as slaves, quoting "Judge not, lest ye be judged!"  Right? Does anyone share this concern? It makes you so nervous, you feel like "Don't judge" is just a cover for anything goes.

BUT....LOVE IS A DOMAIN: 1 Cor. 13: 4-13

Jesus brings the RULE of Love, as his is the gospel of the KINGdom!

Examples of love ruling:
+ The young man offered "friends with benefits"
+ The office gossip
+ The tightwad at tax time

Pure Love is near, and ready to RULE if our hearts are open.

Paul's message sequence in Romans 13-14: Love your neighbor as yourself. The Day is near. Don't judge.

But this cuts both ways! As a mature believer, you cannot let your nervousness about the judging ban change your response to the ban from Yes, Sir! To Yes, but!

Judging is occupational hazard of mature believers, and it feels like zeal for righteousness. But it doesn't work the righteousness of God.


For complete sermon notes online, visit our sermons page.


PRACTICAL TIPS


walking1. Greet every person you see with the thought, "Here is another precious image of God." Try it for a day or two and see what God does in your heart.

2. Meditate on 1 Cor. 4: 1-5 with the person you want to love without judging in mind.

How certain are you of your own motives?  How accurate is one person in "discerning" the motives of another?  How do you feel when others "discern" your motives.

QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION

candy1. Paul probably wrote the letter to the Romans from the city of Corinth, where the temple of Aphrodite was located. Do a Google search on the "cult of Aphrodite." How does this information influence how we read Romans and 1 & 2 Corinthians?

2. What is "paganism," and how does it contrast with the Christian faith?

3. If Paul were to write a "letter to the church in Ann Arbor," what do you think he would say?

4. In light of this series, how should we relate to a close friend who is engaging in hurtful and self-destructive behavior? What would be the difference between judging and loving?

5. How difficult is it to really love? See 1 Cor. 13.

Sunday, October 4, 2009

A Careful Look at the Sin of the Pharisees

Free to Love


SERMON OUTLINE & SUMMARY
Series: Free to Love - How to Leave the Judging to the Judge
Part 3: A Careful Look at the Sin of the Pharisees
October 4, 2009 | by Ken Wilson


SERMON OUTLINE & SUMMARY


Reminder: EACH OF THESE SERMONS IS A FIRST WORD, NOT A FINAL WORD

REVIEW: Primary choice not between good & evil,  righteous & sinners but between competing visions of righteousness. Hence primary conflict: Jesus and the Pharisees.

Disciples heavily influenced by Pharisees. One of reasons for Sermon on Mount: reveal contrast between his path and theirs: "For I tell you unless your righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees and the teachers of the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of heaven."  Mt. 5: 20

Jesus' sharpest disagreement with Pharisees aimed at their foundation: Mt. 7: 1-5

"The Pharisee is that extremely admirable man who subordinates his entire life to his knowledge of good & evil and is as severe a judge of himself as of his neighbor to honor of God, whom he humbly thanks for his knowledge....The Pharisee is not opinionated; special situations and emergencies receive special considerations; forbearance and generosity are not excluded by the gravity of the knowledge of good & evil....The Pharisee is fully conscious of his own faults and of his duty of humility and thankfulness to God." Ethics, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, 30-31

"For the Pharisee every moment of life becomes a situation of conflict in which he has to choose between good and evil."  Ethics, p. 30

Not a matter of how strict or lenient, but a more fundamental posture: an understanding of righteous rooted in tree of life or knowledge of good & evil?

Move from the Sermon on the Mount to the Sermon on the Lake: Mt. 13: 1-3a 

Mt. 13: 24-30

Mt. 13: 36 Disciples as about the parable of the weeds, because it hit them in their blind spot, the same blind spot as the Pharisees.

Mt. 13: 40-43
Key to the parable: the disciples' offer to pull up the weeds
Why pulling up the weeds is a bad idea after all:

Move from the Sermon on the Lake to Sermon Back Home

3 more parables, including another version of parable of weeds [parable of net]

"Once again, the kingdom of heaven is like a net that was let down into the lake and caught all kinds of fish. When it was full, the fishermen pulled it up on the shore. Then they sat down and collected the good fish in baskets, but threw the bad away. This is how it will be at the end of the age. The angels will come and separate the wicked from the righteous and throw them into the blazing furnace, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth. (Mt. 13: 47-50)

Background, see John 21: 1-14. Fisherman typically throw out nets, haul in catch, then finally, separate the catch.

But when Jesus shifts from fishing to "the way it's gonna be in real time" he "once again"  says., "the angels will come and separate"

Fishermen think it's their job to separate the fish and normally it is.  Pharisee think it's their job. Disciples think it's their job. These parables are saying: IT'S NOT YOUR JOB!

Jesus anticipates that this is going to be a struggle for us as much as it was for Pharisees. But if we receive this instruction, he can really make us of us! (Mt. 13: 51-52)

Let's distill what we're learning as it applies to loving:

1. The judging that Jesus warns about tends to separate us from others.

2. We tend to separate ourselves from others by judging them.

3. Judging often leads to premature separation

For complete sermon notes online, visit our sermons page.

PRACTICAL TIPS


walking1. Identify someone you are called to love...but you feel your heart "separating"

Ask the Holy Spirit: Am I judging them?

2. Write down your judgments concerning them on a piece of paper and ask God's guidance on how to relate to each one.

Would Jesus like you to speak directly to the person to work something out?
Would Jesus like to adjust your perspective?
Would Jesus like to say, "Thanks for the help, but I'll do the judging when the time comes"

3. When you're ready to release the judgments to God, go outside [be safe!] and burn the piece of paper along with a prayer of surrender.

See if this doesn't release your heart to love more freely.

QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION

candy1. Who were the Sadducees? Why did they oppose Jesus? How did they differ from the Pharisees?

2. What's the difference between relying on our knowledge of good and evil, and relying on what we see the Father doing? What impact would this have on our lives if we did the latter?

3. In what sense is Jesus "strict"?  In what sense is he "lenient"? How does this differ from the Pharisees? In what ways are we to be "strict" or "lenient"?

4. In what ways do you find yourself separating people into "good" and "evil" categories? Is this something we're supposed to do? Why or why not?

5. What are the positive connotations of the word "judge"?  And the negative?

6. What's the most challenging thing for you so far in this sermon series?